Have you seen the movie Fed Up yet? After watching it last year, I started paying attention to how much added sugars were in the foods that I eat. Last month, I tracked the amount of added and artificial sugar* I consumed during an average workweek (Monday – Friday) and counted the added sugar in things like:
- Peanut/almond butter
- Fage yogurt
- Canned beans
- Non-dairy creamer
Here is a picture of my weekly sugar intake:
Every 4 grams of sugar on a nutrition label is equal to 1 teaspoon of refined white sugar. After 5 days of tracking, I was averaging about 9 teaspoons of sugar each day**. Not horrible, but also not the recommended amount.
How much sugar is recommended? The World Health Organization (WHO) says adults should consume on average no more than 6 teaspoons of sugar a day. The American Heart Association recommends 6 – 9 teaspoons a day.
How much sugar do most people consume? Sources vary; one states: “In 2012, Americans consumed an average of 765 grams of sugar every 5 days, or 130 pounds each year.” (That’s about 38 teaspoons per day.) Another states: Americans eat about 20 teaspoons of sugar a day according to a report from the 2005–10 NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) database.
Actually seeing the sugar in those baggies made things more tangible and made me want to take action. That’s what prompted me to finally do the 10 Day Sugar Free Challenge. I looked at a few different blogs for inspiration and recipes to follow. I liked the info I found here. We (the hubby and I) are doing what I’m calling a “Modified Plan A” version of the rules. I’ll be posting pictures of what we ate and links to the recipes we tried soon!
* According to Fed Up, our bodies’ process all sugars the same, including lactose. I love milk, and I personally don’t think lactose is that bad for me, so I chose to exclude it from this count.
** Because I was tracking my intake, I was hyper-conscious about how much sugar I was consuming, so I may have erred on the side of lower-than-normal-intake that week. But, it still provided a good insight on how much hidden sugar I was eating on any given day!
I’m pretty good at finding grammatical errors.
I’m not, like, a TOTAL Grammar Nazi. I don’t get hung up on syntax, semantics, fragmented sentences, fused sentences, dangling modifiers, or (most) comma errors. But spelling errors, incorrect capitalization/failure to capitalize, omitted words, or wrong words (e.g., affect vs. effect) – those really irk me.
Lately, the irk-me types of errors have been popping up almost daily. From packaging labels*, to NASA’s website, to the neighborhood newspaper, they are virtually everywhere! Is it that people no longer give a shit about good grammar? Maybe. I think it’s more likely that people rarely have a second set of eyes to look at their content before posting/publishing it**.
I’m starting this list as a way to keep track of the mistakes I find for my own piece of mind. I’ll also note whether or not I contacted the author of the mistake, and if so, whether or not they responded. All of these were verified as of their post date.
LIST OF ERRORS:
- Misspelling (“for”): http://www.brit.co/diy-wall-art/
- (Number 43) Shoebox Wall Art: Don’t recycle those shoeboxes just yet! They can be transformed into colorful floating shelves with just a few coats of paint. (Plus, click through fro two more ideas.)
- Multiple errors (capitalization, verb use, missing period between sentences, comma & verb use): http://www.brit.co/alphabet-art/
- (Number 8) THat’s all;
- (Number 10) Admittedly, we was on the fence about including this one.
- (Number 11) We came across this slice of beauty when we were searching the web for foodie prints The rainbow cake seriously rules.
- (Number 12) Gobble gobble, got eat up those green ABC’s!
- Missing word (possibly “to help ensure”): http://karlkapp.com/competition-cooperation-in-gamification/
- Prizes for winners should be of little importance or even symbolic help ensure that the student efforts are intrinsic and not driven by the expected outcome (Cantador & Conde, 2010)
- Missing word (“learner to think”): http://www.gc-solutions.net/blog/using-storytelling-in-e-learning-an-e-learning-strategy/
- They can also encourage the learner think about the described situation or scenario and derive their own endings.
- Missing word (“Not only does this”): http://www.gc-solutions.net/blog/using-storytelling-in-e-learning-an-e-learning-strategy/
- Not only this successfully engages the learner more, it also helps to gauge how much learning has been derived from the story.
- Missing word (“in order to create”)*: http://www.sketchpoststudio.com (page 5 of their downloadable booklet)
- TY PO San Francisco brought together | a slate of international speakers | from across disciplines to discuss how | the design community can embrace | contrast in order create innovative | practices into the next decade.
- *Contacted & response received Jan 2014; document still contains error
- Misuse (“awaiting discovery”)*: http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Beyond
- 6th Need to Know: More than 1,700 extrasolar planets (or exoplanets) planets have been confirmed. There are thousands of potential exoplanets await discovery
- *Contacted March 2015; no response yet
- Repeat word (“I was I was there”)*: http://www.cassiemcdaniel.com/blog/your-patient-is-my-father/
- I don’t know how many different people I was when I was I was there!
- *Contacted & response received Feb 2015; error was fixed
- Misspelling (“Colorado”)*: http://www.northdenvertribune.com/ (Printed version; header on page 3 of Mar 19 – Apr 1 issue)
- *Contacted & response received March 2015
- Incorrect word use (“as” instead of “at): http://www.npr.org/blogs/goatsandsoda/2015/03/26/395345147/whats-up-with-parents-who-dont-vaccinate-their-children?sc=17?f=1001&utm_source=iosnewsapp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=app (3rd paragraph)
- A new study of more than 20,000 people in five countries looks as why people aren’t confident in vaccines.
- Multiple errors (bullet list error, misspelling): http://www.hivestrategies.com/2011/02/rules-fo-a-hipaa-compliant-social-media-polic/
- In “Limit liability by establishing clear policies and procedures” section: Involve leaders, evangelists and frontline staff in the development of these policies and procedures. These policies should: explain appropriate use of social media platforms
- explain appropriate use of social media platforms
- clearly define how information posted there will be use
- In “Regularly monitor your social media platforms” section, 6th paragraph: David Harlow adds an additional cautiion, however.
*Okay, so I didn’t save a picture of the 2 packaging errors I found nor can I recall them exactly, but one was on a General Mills Fiber One or Nature Valley package (they responded by sending me some coupons), and one was on a medicine package (can’t remember which brand; I didn’t contact them and threw the packaging away).
**Much like I’m doing with this post. If you spot any errors, let me know in the Comments below!
< ^_^ >
It doesn’t take much to create a face: two marks for eyes, one for a mouth; a nose isn’t even necessary most of the time! In The Blue Umbrella, a new short by Pixar, you’ll find adorable examples of personified everyday objects:
Long before The Blue Umbrella, I loved spotting “faces” in everyday, inanimate objects! Below is my own random collection of faces I’ve come across around town, at home, or in places I’ve visited:
Doorknob with a rather large nose at the Castle Marne B&B.
This downtown Denver lamppost kinda looks like it has eyes!
Whatchu lookin’ at?!
“Face” formed by windows on a building in downtown Denver.
There’s something charming about this water meter cover… maybe it’s big, round eyes?
Shadow + chalk line = cool face
Sandwiches look so cute right before you eat them.
Okay, so this is an ACTUAL face, but it’s still cool & random nonetheless.
An abstract face formed by building architecture
Do you think a nose is an essential element of facial composition? Where do you see faces? Leave your comments below!
There are a series of sculptures along Broadway from Blake to Lawrence made from salvaged storage containers stacked on top of one another. I used to drive by them every morning on my way to work and every afternoon on the way home. After doing a little internet research I found one article about the sculptures which included info on the artist and title of the piece: Trade Deficit.
There are 3 sculptures in the series. One is small, one is medium and one is large. By large I mean large; it shoots straight up into the sky and is hard to miss from any direction. Each sculpture has a 5-year anti-graffiti coat on it; an essential feature in this part of town.
The medium size sculpture is the one I find most interesting. It has an interactive element that the other two don’t; each and every day it is used by people in this city. I took some pictures that illustrate.
If you’re interested in learning more about the artist, Joseph Riché, and the Denver Public Art Program, visit the Denver Office of Cultural Affairs: http://www.denvergov.org/Welcome/tabid/392922/Default.aspx
Here are some more pictures for fun: